#C TO VB.NET HOW TO#
#C TO VB.NET CODE#
#C TO VB.NET WINDOWS#

That link (which goes to one of the principle Microsoft developers who implemented VB.NET) was our starting point to figure out how to write tooling to convert VB.NET to C# using semantic analysis.

But taking that approach ignores the real, significant semantic differences between the two languages. You can even save yourself the headache of trying to sort out regex expressions and use one of the many language conversion options you can find with a simple Google search. Or to take a slightly more complex example, in VB.NET parentheses are optional on Sub or Func when no parameter is being passed in C# you have to convert those to use empty parentheses, so myObject.ToString gets converted to myObject.ToString(). It's not that hard to find Dim x as IntegerĪnd work through some basics like that. You have to look past the syntactic differences, which seem relatively easy to sort out.

#C TO VB.NET CODE#

They're basically the same.' Those same developers probably think that a little time with regex is all they need to convert their VB.NET source code into good C# code. There are more differences than you might thinkĪre C# and VB.NET the same? For years I've heard developers say, 'Oh, VB.NET is just C# with VB syntax. Since Core is open-source, the sky's the limit as to where it can or will run. You can write command shell apps that run almost anywhere.

#C TO VB.NET WINDOWS#

You can write Windows web apps that run in a Docker container, and you can host the container on a Linux server. NET Core, you can write C# apps that run on Linux. NET classes are available, the implications of this move by Microsoft are substantial. NET Framework, but they're not going to invest in the Framework much (if any) and no more improvements to VB.NET will be forthcoming.Īside from the details of which programming language and which. This doesn't mean your VB.NET apps will stop running on Windows-Microsoft has made it clear they will continue to support. But if you want to write web apps running on ASP.NET Core, you'll need C#. If desktop apps are enough for you and your users, VB.NET works with NET 5, but only to target Windows Forms-not WPF. NET Core, you need to convert VB.NET to C#. NET Core is the future and VB.NET is not going along for the ride. And it brings out loyalty to a degree that makes deadheads look non-committal. I didn't come here to bash VB.NET it's a terrific programming language that helped a lot of people make the jump from VB6 to. My bad.NET Core & C# are the future VB.NET is the past NET Framework was the most beautiful thing I had ever seen. I used to think Windows Forms apps would make me happy forever. All these years, I've never cheated on you. You went from young sexy VB classic to a more stolid VB.NET-yeah, you put on some weight but I still loved you. Remember how great it was when we first met VB.NET? I couldn't stop thinking about you, how easy it was to write a Windows app (goodbye HWNDs!), rapid UI prototyping, DATABASE CONTROLS? I mean, come on: it was love at first sight.

Build a Cross-Platform Object Inventory.

There are countless ways to take advantage of BlackDiamond Studio and SnowConvert.

The premier productivity workbench designed and optimized for teams using Snowflake.

The best available tools to perform code migrations from a source database or Spark application to Snowflake.

Mobilize.Net has an engagement model to fit your needs.

Modernize Legacy Code with Application Migration Tools.Cloud Application Migration Tools Transform Desktop Applications.

C to vb.net